Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
|Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board by
|United States Supreme Court case which held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." Universal Camera added an additional qualification to the substantial evidence test laid down in Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB. The evidence supporting the agency's conclusion must be substantial in consideration of the record as a whole, even including the evidence that is not consistent with the agency's conclusion. — Excerpted from Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951), was a|
United States Supreme Court
UNIVERSAL CAMERA CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Argued: Nov. 6, 7, 1950. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1951
[Syllabus from pages 474-475 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, pro hac vice by special leave of Court, for petitioner.
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.