Lambert v. California
|Lambert v. California
|Opinion of the Court→|
|355 U.S. 225 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the acceptability of ignorance of the law as an excuse for a crime. The court held that in order to be punished, there must be a probability that the accused party had knowledge of the law before committing the crime. — Excerpted from Lambert v. California on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Lambert v. California,|
United States Supreme Court
LAMBERT v. CALIFORNIA
Argued: Oct. 16, 17, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1957
See 355 U.S. 937, 78 S.Ct. 410.
Mr. Samuel C. McMorris, Los Angeles, Cal., for the appellant.
Mr. Warren M. Christopher, Los Angeles, Cal., as amicus curiae.
Messrs. Philip E. Grey, Los Angeles, Cal., and Clarence, A. Linn, San Francisco, for the appellee.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|