Board of Education v. Pico/Dissent O'Connor
From Wikisource
| ←United States Supreme Court | Board of Education v. Pico by Dissenting Opinion |
| Court Documents |
|---|
| Case Syllabus |
| Opinion of the Court |
| Concurring Opinions Blackmun White |
| Dissenting Opinions Burger Powell Rehnquist O'Connor |
 |
JUSTICE O'CONNOR, dissenting.
If the school board can set the curriculum, select teachers, and determine initially what books to purchase for the school library, it surely can decide which books to discontinue or remove from the school library, so long as it does not also interfere with the right of students to read the material and to discuss it. As JUSTICE REHNQUIST persuasively argues, the plurality's analysis overlooks the fact that, in this case, the government is acting in its special role as educator.
I do not personally agree with the Board's action with respect to some of the books in question here, but it is not the function of the courts to make the decisions that have been properly relegated to the elected members of school boards. It is the school board that must determine educational suitability, and it has done so in this case. I therefore join THE CHIEF JUSTICE's dissent.
