Bushnell v. Crooke Mining Smelting Company (150 U.S. 82)/Opinion of the Court
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
We should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that an application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibald v. U.S., 12 Pet. 488; Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U.S. 107; Williams v. Conger, 131 U.S. 390 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 793. Application denied.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse