Daegele v. Kansas/Opinion of the Court
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.
For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, and related cases, 375 U.S. 2, 84 S.Ct. p. 80, Mr. Justice HARLAN would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811, should be applied retroactively.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse