Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro by Harold Hitz Burton
Syllabus
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

335 U.S. 359

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY  v.  GRAND-HYDRO

 Argued: Oct. 12, 13, 1948. --- Decided: Nov 22, 1948

See 335 U.S. 900, 69 S.Ct. 298.

Mr. Howard E. Wahrenbrock, of Washington, D.C., for The United States as amicus curiae.

Mr. Robert L. Davidson, of Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

[Argument of Counsel from page 360 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Robert Dade Hudson, of Tulsa, Okl., and S. Frank Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for respondent.

Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).