Hammer v. Township of Livingston

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Hammer v. Township of Livingston  (1999) 
by the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Syllabus
    
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION

318 N.J. Super. 298; 723 A.2d 988

SUSAN HAMMER AND ALAN HAMMER, HER HUSBAND, PLAIN-TIFFS-APPELLANTS,  v.  TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON AND CRAIG D. DUFFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County.

No. A-3593-97T1  Argued: December 8, 1998 --- Decided: February 18, 1999 --- Approved for Publication February 18, 1999.

Stephen S. Weinstein, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Weinstein, attorney; Gail S. Boertzel, of counsel and on the brief).

Thomas D. Robertson, argued the cause for respondents (McCarter & English, attorneys; James H. Keale, of counsel; Christopher R. Carton, on the brief).

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., EICHEN and COBURN. The opinion of the court was delivered by EICHEN, J.A.D.

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 206.01 of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar official legal documents."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium II § 206.03 and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).


Nuvola apps important.svg
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.