International Salt Company v. United States
|International Salt Company v. United States
|Opinion of the Court→|
|United States Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibits as per se violations all tying arrangements in which a product for which a seller has a legal monopoly, such as a patent, requires purchasers to also buy a product for which the seller has no legal monopoly. — Excerpted from International Salt Co. v. United States on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947), was a case in which the|
United States Supreme Court
INTERNATIONAL SALT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES
Argued: Oct. 16, 1947. --- Decided: Nov 10, 1947
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Mr. Lemuel Skidmore, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|