Le Blanc, Simon (DNB00)
|←Le Bas, Charles Webb||Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, Volume 32
Le Blanc, Simon
|Le Blon, Jacques Christophe→|
LE BLANC, Sir SIMON (d. 1816), judge, second son of Thomas Le Blanc of Charterhouse Square, London, was born about 1748. In June 1766 he was admitted a pensioner, and in the following November elected scholar of Trinity Hall, Cambridge. In February 1773 he was called to the bar at the Inner Temple, and he graduated LL.B. the same year. In 1779 he was elected a fellow of his college. He went the Norfolk circuit, acquired considerable practice, and in February 1787 was called to the degree of serjeant-at-law. In 1791 he was appointed counsel to his university, and in this capacity was one of the counsel retained to show cause against a rule obtained by William Frend [q. v.] for a mandamus to restore him to his franchises as resident M.A. (Howell, State Trials, xxii. 682). On the resignation of Sir William Henry Ashurst [q. v.], 9 June 1799, Le Blanc was appointed to succeed him as puisne judge of the king's bench, and knighted. He was a consummate lawyer, and early showed his independence of mind in the case of Haycraft v. Creasy (2 East 92), where he differed from Lord Kenyon on a point of law which the latter had long treated as established. For his part in two trials for murder on the high seas, which had terminated in acquittals in December 1807 and January 1808, he was charged in the 'Independent Whig' with perverting justice out of mistaken humanity. The charge was entirely without foundation, the responsibility for the verdict in both cases resting wholly with the jury, and the attorney-general accordingly filed an ex officio information for libel against the printer and publisher of the paper, who were tried and found guilty (Anp. Reg, 1808, Chron. * 5 et seq.; and Howell, State Trials, xxx. 1132 et seq.) At the Lancaster spring assizes in 1809 Joseph Hanson, a gentleman of property, was indicted before Le Blanc for a misdemeanour in abetting the weavers of Manchester in a conspiracy to raise their wages. Le Blanc summed up the case with, complete impartiality, but the jury unhesitatingly found for the crown. Le Blanc, however, reserved judgment, which was afterwards given by the court of king's bench, Hanson being sentenced to six months' imprisonment and a fine of 100l. (Howell, State Trials, xxxi. 1 et seq.) At York in 1813 Le Blanc opened with Sir Alexander Thompson [q. v.], afterwards lord chief baron, a special commission for the trial of the Luddites, under which not a few of the conspirators were condemned (ib. pp. 1068, 1102, 1139). His ruling in Rex v. Creevey (1 Maule and Selwyn, 273), decided the same year, to the effect that a member of parliament may be convicted upon an indictment for libel for circulating a newspaper report of a speech delivered in parliament, though the speech itself is privileged, is still a leading authority on the law of libel.
Le Blanc died unmarried on 15 April 1816 at his house in Bedford Square. 'Illo nemo neque integrior erat in civitate neque sanctior.' say the reporters, Maule and Selwyn, in recording the fact. He was buried in the church at Northaw, Hertfordshire, where a eulogistic tablet was placed to his memory. His seat, Northaw House, passed by his will to his brothers, Charles and Francis Le Blanc, and is now in the possession of his nephew, Captain Thomas Edmund Le Blanc. Le Blanc left some manuscript reports, which were incorporated by Henry Roscoe in the third and fourth volumes of 'Douglas's Resorts.' London, 1831, 8vo. Lord Campbell describes his appearance as 'prim and precise.' but expresses a very high opinion of his ability.
[Romilly's Grad. Cant.; Cooper's Annals of Cambridge, iv. 452; Memorials of Cambridge, i. 130; Gunning's Reminiscences, i. 308; Cussans's Hertfordshire, iii. 'Hundred of Cashio,' 13-16; Gent. Mag. 1799 pt. i. 522, 1816 pt. i. 371; Annual Biography, 1817, p. 601; Foss's Lives of the Judges; Campbell's Lives of the Chief Justices, iii. 68, 76, 155, 167.]