Liberato v. Royer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
United States Supreme Court
Liberato v. Royer
Argued: March 15, 1926. --- Decided: April 12, 1926
Messrs. Wm. Hamlin Neely, Paul A. Kunkel, and George Ross Hull, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 535-537 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Arthur H. Hull, of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse