McGee v. International Life Insurance Company
|McGee v. International Life Insurance Company
|International Shoe v. Washington. The Court declared that California did not violate the Due Process Clause by entering a judgment upon a Texas insurance company who was engaged in a dispute over a policy it maintained with a California resident. The importance of this finding is highlighted by the facts of the case; mainly that International Life Insurance did no other business within the state of California besides maintaining this single policy, which the company became responsible for by its acquisition of another insurance company which previously had held the policy. However; the case never explicitly stated that no other business was conducted within California and the previous assumption is presumptive by definition. — Excerpted from McGee v. International Life Insurance Co. on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220 (1957), was a case following in the line of decisions interpreting|
United States Supreme Court
MCGEE v. INTERNATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Argued: Nov. 20, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1957
Mr. Arthur J. Mandell, Houston, Tex., for the petitioner.
Mr. Stanley Hornsby, Austin, for the respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice BLACK, announced by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|