Page:A History of the Inquisition of the Middle Ages-Volume I .pdf/137

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
IN SOUTHERN FRANCE.
117

he followed up in September with a decree addressed to all the faithful in the Patrimony of St. Peter, ordering measures of increasing severity to be inscribed in the local laws of every community, and all podesta and other oiRcials to be sworn to their enforcement under heavy penalties. Proceedings of more or less rigor commanded in Milan, Ferrara, Yerona, Kimini, Florence, Prato, Faenza, Piacenza, and Treviso show the extent of the evil, the difficulty of restraining it, and the encouragement given to heresy by the scandals of the clergy.[1]

It was in southern France, however, that the struggle was deadliest and the battle was fought to its bitter end. There the soil, as we have seen, was the most favorable, and the growth of heresy the rankest. Early in the century we find open resistance at Albi, when the bishop, Sicard, aided by the Abbot of Castres, endeavored to imprison obstinate heretics and was baffled by the people, leading to a dangerous quarrel between the civil and ecclesiastical jurisdictions. About the same time, Amelius of Toulouse tried milder methods by calling in the aid of the celebrated Robert d' Arbrissel, whose preaching, we are told, was rewarded with many conversions. In 1119 Calixtus II. presided over a council at Toulouse which condemned the Manichaean heresy, but was forced to content itself with sentencing the heretics to expulsion from the Church. It is perhaps remarkable that when Innocent II., driven from Rome by the antipope Pier-Leone, was wandering through France and held a great council at Reims in 1131, no measures were taken for the repression of heresy; but when restored to Rome he seems to have awakened to the necessity of action, and in the Second General Lateran Council, in 1139, he issued a decisive decree which is interesting as the earliest example of the interpellation of the secular arm. Not only were the Cathari condemned and expelled from the Church, but the temporal authorities were ordered to coerce them and all those who favored or defended them. This policy was followed up in 1148 by the Council


  1. Schmidt, I. 63-5.— Muratori Antiq. Dissert, lx. (p. 463-3).— Raynald. Annal. ann. 1199 No. 23-5; aim. 1205 No. 67 ; 1207 No. 3.— Lami, Antichita Toscane, p. 491.— Innocent. PP. III. Regest. i. 298; ii. 1, 50; v. 33; vii. 37; viii. 85, 105 ; IX. 7, 8, 18, 19, 166-9, 204, 213, 258; x. 54, 105, 130; xv. 189; Gesta cxxiii.