Page:A critical and exegetical commentary on Genesis (1910).djvu/98

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

(Symbol missingHebrew characters), 'swarming things': 120 721 + (only in P and Dt. 1419).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 122. 28 817 91. 7 1720 283 3511 4727 484 (Ex. 17, Lv. 269; elsewhere only Jer. 318 [inverted], 233, Ezk. 3611).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 129. 30 621 93 + (elsewhere only in Ezk. (10 times), and (as inf.) Jer. 129).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 1032 2513 + (elsewhere 1 Ch. 57 72. 4. 9 828 99. 34 2631). The phrase (Symbol missingHebrew characters)[(Symbol missingHebrew characters)] occurs in P 10 times in Gen. (see p. xxxiv), and in Nu. 31; elsewhere only Ru. 418, 1 Ch. 129.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 617 721 258. 17 3529 4933 + (elsewhere poetical: Zec. 138, Ps. 8816 10429, La. 119, and 8 times in Jb.).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters), (Symbol missingHebrew characters), etc. (appended to enumerations): 618 77. 13 816. 18 98 284 466. 7 +.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters), etc. (after 'seed'): 99 177. 8. 9. 10. 19 3512 484 +.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 713 1723. 26 +; only in P and Ezk. 23 242 401 (Jos. 1027 redactional).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 819 105. 20. 31 3640 + (very often in P: elsewhere only Nu. 1110 [JE], 1 Sa. 1021, 1 Ch. 57 647. 48).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 916 177. 13. 19 +, only in P.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 172. 6. 29 + Ex. 17; elsewhere only Ezk. 99 1613.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 125 136 3118 367 466 +; elsewhere Gn. 1411. 12. 16. 21 1514; and 15 times in Ch. Ezr. Dn.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 125 3118 366 466 +.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters) (= 'person'): 125 366 4615. 18. 22. 25. 26. 27 +; "much more frequent in P than elsewhere."—(Symbol missingHebrew characters)(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 177. 9. 12 + 36 times (only in P).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 178 284 367 371 479 + Ex. 64; elsewhere Ezk. 2038, Ps. 5516 11954, Jb. 1819 +.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 178 234. 9. 20 3643 4711 484 4930 5013 +. Often in Ezk. (4428 455. 6. 7. 8 4616. 18 4820. 21. 22); elsewhere Ps. 28, 1 Ch. 728 92 [= Neh. 113], 2 Ch. 1114 311 +.—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 1712. 13. 23. 27 2318 + (confined to P except Jer. 3211. 12. 14. 16).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters) (= 'father's kin'): 1714 258. 17 3529 4933 + (also Ezk. 1818; elsewhere Ju. 514?, Ho. 1014 +).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 234 + 10 times (also 1 Ki. 171?, 1 Ch. 2915, Ps. 3913).—(Symbol missingHebrew characters): 3118 [3423] 366 + (outside of P, only Ezk. 3812f.; Pr. 47, Ps. 10424 10521).

In the choice of synonymous expressions, P exhibits an exclusive preference for (Symbol missingHebrew characters) in the sense of 'beget' over (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (in the genealogies of J), and for the form (Symbol missingHebrew characters) of the 1st pers. pron. ((Symbol missingHebrew characters) only in Gn. 234).

Geographical designations peculiar to Pg are: Kiryath-'Arba (for Hebron) 232 3527 +; Machpelah, 239. 17. 19 259 4930 5013 +; Paddan-Aram, 2520 282. 5. 6. 7 3118 3318 359. 26 4615 +.—To these may be added (Symbol missingHebrew characters), 1131 125 1312 163 178 232. 19 3118 3318 356 371 +; the expression is found in JE only in the Joseph-section (chs. 42, 44, 45, 47). Pg has (Symbol missingHebrew characters) without (Symbol missingHebrew characters) only in (Symbol missingHebrew characters) (281 362).

In view of all these and similar peculiarities (for the list is by no means exhaustive), the attempt to obliterate the linguistic and stylistic distinction between P and JE (Eerdmans) is surely a retrograde step in criticism.


The date of the composition of Pg lies between the promulgation of the Deuteronomic law (621 B.C.), and the post-Exilic reformation under Ezra and Nehemiah (444). It is later than Deut., because it assumes without question the centralisation of worship at one sanctuary, which in Dt. is only held up as an ideal to be realised by a radical reform of established usage. A nearer determination of date depends on questions of the internal analysis of P which are too complex to be entered on here. That the