Page:Adapting and Writing Language Lessons.pdf/66

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Three Qualities
CHAPTER 3

Once again, transparency is not an absolute value. One good aspect of inductive teaching of grammar, for example, is the fun of working one's way out of a temporary structural fog.

Needless to say, opacity is to be calculated from the point of view of the learner. If the writer or adapter knows the language too well, he may forget that what seems obvious to him may be perplexing for students from a very different language background. On the other hand, writers sometimes spend much effort in elaborate explanation of a point that really causes the students no trouble.

Summary comments on the three qualities

The differences among the three qualities may perhaps be clarified by looking at the following sentences:

Weak,light,transparent: The book is on the table.
Weak,heavy,transparent: The big red book is on the little table by the open window.
Weak,heavy,opaque: The seldom commented-upon but frequently observed location for a book is that in which we now find this one.
(potentially) strong,heavy,opaque: The repast which the cook, for our enjoyment and his own self-satisfaction has (in a manner of speaking) prepared for our lunch today is pizza.
(potentially) strong,light,opaque: I paid half the then going rate.
(potentially) strong,heavy,transparent: We're going to have pizza with mushrooms, anchovies and pepperoni.
(potentially) strong,light,transparent:We're going to have pizza for lunch!

Obviously, in even the best of lessons some lines will be stronger than others, every line has some heaviness, and many

49