Page:American Journal of Sociology Volume 15.djvu/480

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

466 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY

Staff. Both the selection and training of assistants is best when controlled by the governing head of each reformatory. The civil-service system wards off some improper demands for appointments but at the same time restricts the range of selection and hinders prompt si f ting-out of the unfit. Its serviceableness, however, preponderates.

So delicate and easily disturbed is the generative reformative process that outsiders — ^the would-be special philanthropists, pro- fessional religious revivalists, advertising Salvationists — should generally be excluded; or if at all admitted to any participation, their ministrations should, under the direction of the governor, be made to fit into the established culture course. Even a resident official chaplain may inadvertently interfere with the germination of reformations. I have found the resident chaplain to be less desirable for religious ministrations than an itinerant service. One mind, and that the mind of the resident reformatory gov- ernor, must have and hold and yield every operating agency — impel, steady, and direct the whole and every item of the pro- cedure. Such completeness of control requires an exacting and strenuous disciplinary regime which for effectiveness must in- clude the principle and exercise of coercion.

A majority of prisoners instinctively respond to the inherent persuasion of the combined agencies; and of those who do not a majority readily respond to the moral coerciveness of the agencies. Some, only a small ratio, do not respond at first, except to some form of corporal coercion — some bodily inconvenience and discomfort. These, the irresponsive, who, for the good of the prison community and for the public safety most need refor- mation, should not be neglected nor relegated to incorrigibility until every possible effort has unavailingly been made for their recovery. The advantages proffered are, naturally, not appre- ciated until availed of and enjoyed. Some cannot adopt and carry into execution measures calculated for their own good without the intervention of coercion. Adjustment to environ- ment, even if it is compulsory, leads from the avoidance of bodily risks to the avoidance of social risks and thus to non-criminal habits, which, when duly formed, no longer need the prop of