THE SOCIOLOGY OF CONFLICT 689
against individuals in the other group come to expression. Accordingly, struggle between two groups within a third group usually evokes in this third group all the malice and resentment against one of them which of themselves would not have come to expression ; but now, while the other hostility has led the way, they are occasioned as a sort of annex to the operation of this instigating hostility. It is quite in accordance with this trait that, especially in earlier times, the unifying relationships of populations as wholes to each other were martial only, while the other assimilations, like commerce, hospitality, intermarriage, were relationships which affected merely the intercourse of indi- viduals. Understandings between the peoples made these rela- tionships possible, to be sure, but did not of themselves put them into effect.
GEORG SIMMEL. BERLIN, GERMANY.
\To be continued^
