- [Footnote: relations given by me in the Dictionnaire des Sciences
naturelles, T. xviii. 1820, p. 422-436; and in the Annales de Chimie et de Physique, T. xvi. 1821, p. 267-292.)
The numerical relations of the forms of plants, and the laws observed in their geographical distribution, may be considered in two very different ways. If plants are studied in their arrangement according to natural families, without regard to their geographical distribution, it is asked, What are the fundamental forms or types of organisation to which the greatest number of species correspond? Are there on the entire surface of the earth more Glumaceæ than Compositæ? Do these two orders make up between them one-fourth part of the whole number of phænogamous plants? What is the proportion of Monocotyledons to Dicotyledons? These are questions of General Phytology, or of the science which investigates the organisation of plants and their mutual connection, or the present state of the entire vegetable world.
If, on the other hand, the species of plants which have been grouped according to the analogy of their structure are considered, not abstractedly, but according to their climatic relations, or according to their distribution over the surface of the earth, we have questions offering quite another and distinct interest. We then examine what are the families which prevail more in proportion to other Phanerogamæ in the torrid zone than towards the polar circle? Are Compositæ more numerous, either in the same geographical latitudes or on the same isothermal lines, in the New than in the Old Continent? Do the forms which gradually lose]*
