Page:Aspects of nature in different lands and different climates; with scientific elucidations (IA b29329668 0002).pdf/314

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
  • [Footnote: bark. (Compare my memoir entitled "über die China-wälder"

in the "Magazin der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde" zu Berlin, Jahrg. I. 1807, S. 59.) The story of the natives having learnt the virtues of the Cinchona from the lions who "cure themselves of intermittent fevers by gnawing the bark of the China (or Quina) trees,"—(Hist. de l'Acad. des Sciences, année 1738, Paris, 1740, p. 233),—appears to be entirely of European origin, and nothing but a monkish fable. Nothing is known in the New Continent of the "Lion's fever," for the large so-called American Lion (Felis concolor), and the small mountain Lion (Puma) whose foot-*marks I have seen on the snow, are never tamed and made the subjects of observation; nor are the different species of Felinæ in either continent accustomed to gnaw the bark of trees. The name of Countess's Powder (Pulvis Comitissæ), occasioned by the remedy having been distributed by the Countess of Chinchon, was afterwards changed to that of Cardinal's or Jesuit's powder, because Cardinal de Lugo, Procurator-General of the order of the Jesuits, spread the knowledge of this valuable remedy during a journey through France, and recommended it to Cardinal Mazarin the more urgently, as the brethren of the order were beginning to prosecute a lucrative trade in South American Quina-bark which they obtained through their missionaries. It is hardly necessary to remark, that in the long controversy which ensued respecting the good or bad effects of the fever bark, the protestant physicians sometimes permitted themselves to be influenced by religious intolerance and dislike of the Jesuits.]