committee's inquiry, and have those documents been identified as responsive?
[Witness conferred with counsel.]
The Witness. I'll answer.
Mr. MacDougald. He'll answer the question.
The Witness. So my strong recollection, right—and we're talking about events that are closing on a year ago—is that that's not an email address that I established. That's an email address that the tech contractors who had offices inside DOJ for the Civil Division established, and that that was used for purposes of, you know—so, if I would do an argument—and I did several arguments, including in those months—I wouldn't tend to do it from my desk. I would tend to do it either from a side desk that I had, or from the conference room.
And so I would have the tech person set up a loaner laptop, and then I would email him the Zoom link or whatever, you know, the instrumentality was. And then I think—so that—I think he would open that account on the loaner laptop, and then, you know, connect to the court link for the argument. So I think that's what that account is for.
I did make an effort to see if, you know—I have senses of kind of like what passwords might be, could I log into that, and I couldn't. And I suspect, again, based on my best recollection as I sit here, that the reason why I couldn't log in is I didn't create the account, so I don't know what the password is.
Did you use a gmail account, a personal email account, to conduct any official business during your time at the Department?
The Witness. I think that, on that, we're going to stand on the letter.
How about personal cell phone? Were there communications, text messages that you might possess responsive to the subpoena on a personal device?
The Witness. Same as the last—
