Page:Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices, II (1984).pdf/116

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

400-40

496
Sound recordings as derivative works. (cont'd)
496.01
Derivative sound recordings. (cont'd)

distinction is important since it determines when a "material added" statement will be required on the application.

Examples:

1)
A sound recording of a Beethoven symphony may be considered a derivative work under the definition in the statute, in the sense that it embodies a preexisting musical composition. If it is an entirely new recording, however, the Copyright Office does not regard it as a derivative sound recording for registration purposes.
2)
If a previously released recording of a Beethoven symphony was later remixed, the resulting sound recording would be a deri­vative sound recording.
496.01(a)
When a "material added" statement will not be required. On an application for registration, a statement of material added will not be required for a sound recording consisting of an entirely new fixation where the authorship statement refers only to the sound recording.
496.01(b)
When a "material added" statement will be required. On an application for registration, the Copyright Office will require a statement of material added for a sound recording containing pre­viously published or registered sounds, or sounds fixed before February 15, 1972. The Copyright Office will also require a statement of material added if the authorship statement on the appli­cation refers to element(s) other than the sound recording (for example, the underlying work or artwork on the record jacket) which have been previously pub­lished or registered.
[1984]