Page:Cyclopedia of painters and paintings (IA cyclopediaofpain03cham).pdf/236

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

and completed by Filippino Lippi, and that of them Masaccio painted nine only, namely: Expulsion from Eden, St. Peter healing Tabitha and curing the Cripple at the Gate of the Temple; Seeking of the Tribute Money and its payment by St. Peter; The Expulsion; Sermon of St. Peter (?); St. Peter Baptizing; Distribution of Alms; SS. Peter and John curing the Sick; Resurrection of the Child and St. Peter in Cathedra, partly executed by Filippino Lippi. This takes from Masaccio two of the finest works in the chapel—the Crucifixion of St. Peter, and the Arraignment of SS. Peter and Paul before the Proconsul—both painted by Filippino Lippi, and therefore to some extent diminishes his glory. It, however, leaves him enough to entitle him to be considered the greatest painter of his time, and to be called the father of modern art, through careful study of the human form, and investigation of the laws of light and shade which govern relief, as well as of the management of drapery in broad masses; he rescued painting from mediævalism, and gave an impulse which finally brought the art to that perfection which it afterwards attained in the hands of Raphael. Each event represented by Masaccio is like a scene upon the stage where the actors are grouped with due regard to effect. Many of the heads are portraits, and all the figures are studied from life in a naturalistic spirit, which faithfully renders the costumes worn by the men and women of the time. Even Raphael did not disdain to take Masaccio's noble group of Adam and Eve driven from Paradise as a model when he treated the same subject in the Vatican. The few other extant works of Masaccio are: Fragment of a Procession, cloister of the Carmine; The Trinity between the Virgin and St. John the Evangelist, with two donors, S. M. Novella (much injured); Conception, Florence Academy; and portrait of himself (?), perhaps by Filippino Lippi, Uffizi; Adoration of the Magi, Diptych with Martyrdom of SS. Peter and John the Baptist, Berlin Museum.—C. & C., Italy, i. 519; Vasari, ed. Mil., ii. 287, 305; Layard, The Brancacci Chapel, Arundel Society (1868); Dohme, 2i.; Ch. Blanc, École florentine; Baldinucci, i. 460; Burckhardt, 529; Lübke, Gesch. ital. Mal., i. 285, 290; Zeitschr. f. b. K., xi. 225; xii. 175.


MASO. See Giottino.


MASOLINO DA PANICALE, born at Panicale in 1383, died in Florence in Oct. (buried, 18th), 1440. Florentine school; real name Tommaso di Cristofano di Fino; pupil of Gherardo da Starnina, and probably master of Masaccio. Vasari confounds him with Maso di Cristoforo Braccii, and his account is therefore untrustworthy. Masolino had no hand in the famous frescos of the Brancacci Chapel. He was admitted into the guild of the Physicians and Apothecaries in Florence in 1423, and shortly afterwards entered the service of Pippo Spani, Obergespann of Temeswar, Hungary. After Spani's death (1427) he returned to Italy, and executed, about 1428, for Cardinal Castiglione, a series of frescos in the Church of Castiglione di Olona and in the adjoining baptistery. These, which were unknown to Vasari, were lately rescued from whitewash and are signed with his name. Those in the choir represent events in the lives of the Virgin, and of SS. Lawrence and Stephen, to whom the church is dedicated. With no little religious sentiment, which is at times so expressed as to recall Fra Angelico, with a conscientious care for details of form and composition and a system of architectural and figure arrangement which has no little analogy with that of his great pupil, Masaccio, Masolino elaborated detail at the expense of breadth, and made solitary figures unduly prominent. His compositions are monotonous, both on account of lack of variety in arrangement and the absence of contrast in light and shade. His heads are characteristic, and his extremities carefully studied from nature. In the frescos of the baptistery at Castiglione, which represent scenes in the life of St. John, the faces are excellent and the action is weak. Considerable bold-