Page:Descent of Man 1875.djvu/386

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
370
The Descent of Man.
Part II.

argue that the song of the male cannot serve to charm the female, because the females of some few species, such as of the canary, robin, lark, and bullfinch, especially when in a state of widowhood, as Bechstein remarks, pour forth fairly melodious strains. In some of these cases the habit of singing may be in part attributed to the females having been highly fed and confined,[1] for this disturbs all the usual functions connected with the reproduction of the species. Many instances have already been given of the partial transference of secondary masculine characters to the female, so that it is not at all surprising that the females of some species should possess the power of song. It has also been argued, that the song of the male cannot serve as a charm, because the males of certain species, for instance of the robin, sing during the autumn.[2] But nothing is more common than for animals to take pleasure in practising whatever instinct they follow at other times for some real good. How often do we see birds which fly easily, gliding and sailing through the air obviously for pleasure? The cat plays with the captured mouse, and the cormorant with the captured fish. The weaver-bird (Ploceus), when confined in a cage, amuses itself by neatly weaving blades of grass between the wires of its cage. Birds which habitually fight during the breeding-season are generally ready to fight at all times; and the males of the capercailzie sometimes hold their Balzen or eks at the usual place of assemblage during the autumn.[3] Hence it is not at all surprising that male birds should continue singing for their own amusement after the season for courtship is over.

As shewn in a previous chapter, singing is to a certain extent an art, and is much improved by practice. Birds can be taught various tunes, and even the unmelodious sparrow has learnt to sing like a linnet. They acquire the song of their foster parents,[4] and sometimes that of their neighbours.[5] All the common songsters belong to the Order of Insessores, and their vocal organs are much more complex than those of most other birds; yet it is a singular fact that some of the Insessores, such as ravens, crows, and magpies, possess the proper apparatus,[6]

  1. D. Barrington, 'Phil. Transact.' 1773, p. 262. Bechstein, 'Stubenvögel,' 1840, s. 4.
  2. This is likewise the case with the water-ouzel, see Mr. Hepburn in the 'Zoologist,' 1845–1846, p. 1068.
  3. L. Lloyd, 'Game Birds of Sweden,' 1867, p. 25.
  4. Barrington, ibid. p. 264, Bechstein, ibid, s, 5.
  5. Dureau de la Malle gives a curious instance ('Annales des Sc. Nat.' 3rd series, Zoolog. tom. x. p. 118) of some wild blackbirds in his garden in Paris, which naturally learnt a republican air from a caged bird.
  6. Bishop, in 'Todd's Cyclop. of Anat. and Phys.' vol. iv. p. 1496.