Page:EB1911 - Volume 09.djvu/76

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
PALAEOGRAPHY]
EGYPT
63
A1
; of a person or a man’s name.
O1
; of buildings.
O49
; of inhabited places.
N25
; of foreign countries.
T14
; club; of foreigners.
A2
; of all actions of the mouth—eating and speaking, likewise silence and hunger.
N35A
; ripple-lines; of liquid.
F27
; hide; of animals, also leather, &c.
M2
; of plants and fibres.
F51
; of flesh.
Y1
; a sealed papyrus-roll; of books, teaching, law, and of abstract ideas generally.

In the earliest inscriptions the use of determinatives is restricted to

the 
A1
B1
, &c.,

after proper names, but it developed immensely later, so that few words beyond the particles were written without them in the normal style after the Old Kingdom.

Some few signs ideographic of a group of ideas are made to express particular words belonging to that group by the aid of phonograms which point out the special meaning. In such cases the ideogram is not merely a determinative nor yet quite a word-sign. Thus

T14G17
 = 
D36G1G17T14
“Semite,”
T14W24
 = 
V13V28N35
W24
T14
“Libyan,” &c.,
but 
T14

cannot stand by itself for the name of any particular foreign people. So also in monogram

N40
 is šm “go,”
O35
 is “conduct.”

Orthography.—The most primitive form of spelling in the hieroglyphic system would be by one sign for each word, and the monuments of the Ist Dynasty show a decided tendency to this mode. Examples of it in later times are preserved in the royal cartouches, for here the monumental style demanded special consciseness. Thus, for instance, the name of Tethmosis III.—MN-ḪPR-Rꜥ—is spelled

<
N5Y5L1
>

(as Rꜥ is the name of the sun-god, with customary deference to the deity it is written first though pronounced last). A number of common words—prepositions, &c.—with only one consonant are spelled by single alphabetic signs in ordinary writing. Word-signs used singly for the names of objects are generally marked with

Z1

in classical writing, as—

F34
Z1
ỉb, “heart,”
D2
Z1
ḥr, “face,” &c.

But the use of bare word-signs is not common. Flexional consonants are almost always marked by phonograms, except in very early times; as when the feminine word

I10
 = z.t, “cobra,” is spelled 
I10
X1 Z1
.

Also, if a sign had more than one value, a phonogram would be added to indicate which of its values was intended: thus

M23
 in 
M23G43
 is św, “he,”
but in 
M23
X1
 it is śtn, “king.”

Further, owing to the vast number of signs employed, to prevent confusion of one with another in rapid writing they were generally provided with “phonetic complements,” a group being less easily misread than a single letter. E.g.

V24
, wz, “command,” is regularly written 
V24G43
, wz (w);
but 
T3
, ḥz, “white,” is written 
T3I10
, ḥz(z).

This practice had the advantage also of distinguishing determinatives from phonograms. Thus the root or syllable ḥn is regularly written

V28M2
N35

to avoid confusion with the determinative

M2
.

Redundance in writing is the rule; for instance,

b is often spelled 
D58G29G1
 (b)b’(’).

Biliteral phonograms are very rare as phonetic complements, nor are two biliteral phonograms employed together in writing the radicals of a word.

Spelling of words purely in phonetic or even alphabetic characters is not uncommon, the determinative being generally added. Thus in the pyramidal texts we find

ḫpr, “become,” written 
L1
in one copy of a text, in another 
Aa1 Q3
D21
.

Such variant spellings are very important for fixing the readings of word-signs. It is noteworthy that though words were so freely spelled in alphabetic characters, especially in the time of the Old Kingdom, no advance was ever made towards excluding the cumbersome word-signs and biliteral phonograms, which, by a judicious use of determinatives, might well have been rendered quite superfluous.

Abbreviations.—We find

S34U28S29
,

strictly ꜥnḫ zś standing for the ceremonial viva! ꜥnḫ wz’ śnb. “Life, Prosperity and Health,” and in course of time

Y1

was used in accounts instead of

S23
 dmz, “total.”

Monograms are frequent and are found from the earliest times. Thus

N40
O35

mentioned above are monograms, the association of

N37
 and 
D54

having no pictorial meaning. Another common monogram is

O10
i.e. 
O6
 and 
G5
 for Ḥ·t-Ḥrw “Hathor.”

A word-sign may be compounded with its phonetic complement, as

T5
 ḥz “white,”

or with its determinative, as

S14
 ḥz “silver.”

The table on the opposite page shows the uses of a few of the commoner signs.

The decorative value of hieroglyphic was fully appreciated in Egypt. The aim of the artist-scribe was to arrange his variously shaped characters into square groups, and this could be done in great measure by taking advantage of the different ways in which many words could be spelt. Thus ḥs could be written

V28 W14
O34
ḥsy 
W14M17M17
ḥs-f 
W14O34
I9
ḥs-n-f 
W14N35
I9
.

But some words in the classical writing were intractable from this point of view. It is obvious that the alphabetic signs played a very important part in the formation of the groups, and many words could only be written in alphabetic signs. A great advance was therefore made when several homophones were introduced into the alphabet in the Middle and New Kingdoms, partly as the result of the wearing away of old phonetic distinctions, giving the choice between

O34
 and 
S29
X1V13
 and 
U33
,
G17
 and 
Aa13
N35
 and 
S3
G43
 and 
Z7
.

In later times the number of homophones in use increased greatly throughout the different classes, the tendency being much helped by the habit of fanciful writing; but few of these homophones found their way into the cursive script. Occasionally a scribe of the old times indulged his fancy in “sportive” or “mysterious” writing, either inventing new signs or employing old ones in unusual meanings. Short sportive inscriptions are found in tombs of the XIIth Dynasty; some groups are so written cursively in early medical papyri, and certain religious inscriptions in the royal tombs of the XIXth and XXth Dynasties are in secret writing. Fanciful writing abounds on the temples of the Ptolemaic and Roman periods.

Palaeography

Hieroglyphic.—The main division is into monumental or epigraphic hieroglyphs and written hieroglyphs. The former may be rendered by the sculptor or the painter in stone, on wood, &c., with great delicacy of detail, or may be simply sunk or painted in outline. When finely rendered they are of great value to the student investigating the origins of their values. No other system of writing bears upon its face so clearly the history of its development as the Egyptian; yet even in this a vast amount of work is still required to detect and disentangle the details. Monumental hieroglyphic did not cease till the 3rd century A.D. (Temple of Esna). The written hieroglyphs, formed by the scribe with the reed pen on papyrus, leather, wooden tablets, &c., have their outlines more or less abbreviated, producing eventually the cursive scripts hieratic and demotic. The written hieroglyphs were employed at all periods, especially for religious texts.

Hieratic.—A kind of cursive hieroglyphic or hieratic writing is found even in the Ist Dynasty. In the Middle Kingdom it is well