FAIRFAX at St Join s College, Cambridge, about four years (1626-30), and then proceeded to Holland to serve as a volunteer with the English army in the Low Countries under Lord Vere of Tilbury. This connexion led to one still closer ; in the summer of 1637 Fairfax married Anne, daughter of Lord Vere, a lady of spirit, whom Mr Carlyle characterizes as " a V r ere of the fighting Veres and given to Presbyterianism." The Fairfaxes, though serving at first under diaries I., were opposed to the arbitrary prerogative of the crown, and Sir Thomas (he had been knighted by Charles in 1640) declared that " his judgment was for the parliament as the king and kingdom s great and safest council." When Charles en deavoured to raise a guard for his own person at York, in tending it, as the event afterwards proved, to form the nucleus of an army, Fairfax was employed to present a petition to his sovereign, entreating him to hearken to the voice of his parliament, and to discontinue the raising of troops. This was at a great meeting of the freeholders and farmers of Yorkshire convened by the king on Heyworth Moor near York. Charles evaded receiving the petition, pressing his horse forward, but Fairfax followed him and placed the petition on the pommel of the king s saddle. The incident is typical of the times and of the actors in the scene. War broke out, Lord Fairfax was appointed general of the Parliamentary forces in the north, and his son Sir Thomas, was made general of the horse under him. Both father and son distinguished themselves iu the campaigns in Yorkshire. At first the Parliamentary troops were not successful. The Cavalier spirit of honour and high-bred loyalty was too much, as Cromwell said, for poor tapsters and town-apprentice people. There was little hope of suc cess until men of strong religious feelings could be brought into the field against them, and this was effected by Oliver and his Ironsides, his invulnerable troop of disciplined horsemen. In the beginning of 1644 the Scottish army under the command of the earl of Laven joined the Parliamentary forces, and after some minor engagements, commenced the siege of York, then invested by the marquis of Newcastle. York was considered the second town of England, and upon its preservation Charles believed that the safety of his crown mainly depended. There were several assaults and sallies, but news having arrived that Prince Rupert was marching to raise the siege with 20,000 men, the besieging generals, Leven, Fairfax, and Manchester, resolved to draw oft their troops, and en camp on the moor seven miles west of York. On the 2nd of July 1644, was fought the important battle of Marston Moor, which virtually decided the fate of the war. The gallantry of the troopers led by the old earl of Leven, Manchester, and Fairfax was conspicuous. 1 Fail-fax was severely wounded, and he lost a brother in the action. The victory was so decisive that the marquis of Newcastle fled the kingdom, and the Royalists abandoned all hopeof retriev ing their affairs. The city of York was taken, and nearly the whole north submitted to the parliament. In the south and west of England, however, the Royalist cause was still active. The war had lasted two years, and the nation began to complain of the contributions that were exacted and the excesses that were committed by the mili- 1 Cromwell, in the letter to his brother-in-law, assumes the whole credit of the defeat of the Royalist right, certainly at the expense both of truth and honour. He says : " The left wing which I commanded, being our own horse, saving a few Scots in our rear, beat all the Prince s horse. God made them as stubble to our swords." Now the few Scots consisted of 1920 men out of 4200, and Cromwell s asser tion that they were in the rear is contradicted by every other eye witness who mentions them. Principal Bailie, who received a long account of the battle from his namesake, and had other sources of in formation now lost, says that David Leslie (Leveu) in all places that day was Cromwell s leader. M.ivkham s Life of Fairfax. Mr Carlyle does not take up this disputed point. tary. Dissatisfaction was expressed with the military com manders, Essex and Manchester, and as a preliminary step to reform, the self-denying ordinance was passed. This Act took from all members of parliament their commands iu the army or their civil employments. The earl of Essex was removed from the supreme command, and Sir Thomas Fairfax appointed his successor. Cromwell, as a member of the House of Common.?, was excluded by the ordinance, but he was too important to be dispensed with; he was made lieutenant-general under Fairfax. The army was new modelled, incompetent officers were dismissed, and the regiments completed by more select levies. The hostile armies met on the 14th of June 1645, at Naseby in North amptonshire, and a decisive battle took place, which ended iu the total discomfiture of the Royalists. The king him self was in the field. "At Naseby," says Carlyle, "Charles fought his last battle dashed fiercely against the new model army which he had despised till then and saw him self shivered utterly to ruin" partly through the fiery rashness of Prince Rupert, but mainly through the able generalship of Fairfax and Cromwell. The king fled to Wales. Fairfax besieged Leicester, and was successful at Taunton, Bridgewater, and Bristol. The whole west was soon reduced to obedience. The king had returned from Wales and established himself at Oxford, where there was a strong garrison, but danger was too apparent ; the vacillat ing monarch withdrew secretly, and proceeded to Newark to throw himself into the arms of the Scots. Oxford capitulated ; and by the end of September Charles hud neither army nor garrison in England. Fairfax arrived in London on the 12th of November 1645. In his progress towards the capital he was accom panied by applauding crowds Complimentary speeches and thanks were presented to him by both houses of parlia ment, along with a jewel of great value set with diamonds, and a sum of money. Charles was delivered up to the commissioners of parliament by the Scots in January 1646. He had voluntarily surrendered himself to the Scots army, and they negotiated with the parliamentary leaders in his favour. There was a debt of ,600,000, arrears of pay, owing to the Scots, but they agreed to take 400,000, one half of which was to be paid before the army left England. The bargain was concluded some months before there was any stipulation to deliver up the king, but probably, as Hallam remarks, the parliament would never have actually paid the money on any other consideration than the delivering of the king s person. 2 The transaction was naturally seized upon by the Royalists and the Cavalier wits, and poets, as a subject of obloquy and reproach to the Scots commissioners, and, by implication, to the whole Scottish nation. It is not yet forgotten. Such political libels are not of that class which the poet says are " born to die." They become the shibboleths of a party, and descend from generation to generation. Charles was delivered up to the commissioners of parlia ment on the 30th January 1646-7. Fairfax, who preceded the king, having met him beyond Nottingham, dismounted from his horse, kissed the royal hand, and having resumed his seat, discoursed with the unfortunate prince during the journey to Holdenby. "The general," said Charles, "is a man of honour, and keeps his word which he had pledged to me." His chivalrous courtesy is of a piece -with his whole character. The agitation in the army now became formidable, and threatened anarchy. The Independents were too powerful for both parliament and Presbyterians. Fairfax resolved to 2 Major-General Skippon carried up the cash, 200,000, to Newcastle successfully in a proper number of waggons ; got it all counted there, bags of 100, chests of 1000 (5-19th January 1C46-
7), after which the Scots marched peaceably away. Carlyle.