a great effect on the nature of the floods which may result from any definite rainfall.
 | An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/138}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. |  |
Edwin D. Dreyfus, in Industrial Engineering
Fig. 107. Mean Temperatures for Each Month in the Year at Different Cities. Plotted from Records of the United States Signal Service and of Blodgett's Climatology of the United States
Information for eight different cities is so given that comparisons are
easily made. Note the different lines used here instead of colors.
Since Pittsburgh was the city under prime consideration, the Pittsburgh
line was made heavy that it might be most clearly seen. This
chart gives a great amount of data in smaller space than would be
required to show the facts by any method other than the use of curves
In Fig. 109 also we are particularly interested in comparing the shape of the curves for the distinctly different materials under consideration. Here the curves represent reactions affected by the definite laws of physics, and we can join the plotted points resulting from different observations so as to get smooth curves. Work in engineering, physics, and chemistry depends very largely on the interpretation of smooth curves like these, and world progress would be greatly retarded if the graphic method were not available to assist in preserving and interpreting the results of elaborate experiment and voluminous research.
In selecting a scale for Fig. 110 the draftsman is torn between a desire to show the San Francisco fire peak at its correct height, and an opposing desire to show on a large scale the data for a whole series of years so that the fluctuations from month to month may be clearly defined. It seemed best to cut off the top of the San Francisco peak so as to show the monthly data on a scale large enough to assure clearness. To get the correct slope for the two sides of the San Francisco peak, a piece of paper was laid down adjoining the chart and a point was located in the correct position for the top of the San Francisco peak. The sides of the peak were then drawn so that they would meet at that point if extended. Even though the figures for the San Francisco peak are given at the top of the chart where the peak is
