relative importance of the materials listed. It frequently happens that the second or third item on a list may have only one-tenth the importance of the first item. Because the three names are given one after the other, the pupil is quite likely to consider the three items of equal importance, just as three persons may be of different height, yet of about the same importance. The graphic method judiciously applied to school geography and to general commercial geography would make a tremendous difference in the student's grasp of the subject.
 | An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/42}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. |  |
Tarr and McMurray's New Geographies
Fig. 19. The Six Leading Cotton-producing Countries in 1910
This arrangement is a bad one to place before school children.
The eye cannot fit one square into another on an area basis so
as to get the correct ratio
Fig. 19 is a typical example taken from a geography book in which the attempt was made to use the graphic method. The introduction of the picture of the bale of cotton in Fig. 19 is justifiable. There is, however, no justification for placing the picture inside of one of the series of squares. The picture detracts from the size of the square. Graphic comparisons, wherever possible, should be made in one dimension only. In such a case as this, one-dimension presentation is perfectly feasible by the use of bars of different lengths. The pupil would find it an almost hopeless task to fit one side of the block for Brazil into one side of the block for the United States and then square the resulting ratio in order to learn that the United States produces, roughly, thirty times as much cotton as Brazil. Bars in one dimension only would show the comparison accurately. Under any circumstances, the use of the squares of Fig. 19 with the center line through the centers of the squares gives an extremely poor arrangement.
| An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/42}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. | |
Dodge's Advanced Geography
Fig. 20. The World's Production of Cotton in 1905 in Millions of Pounds
The above illustration together with the title is shown exactly
as given in a recent geography book. Charts like this
greatly assist the pupil in getting the correct relative importance
of the different things studied. Note the scale
at the top of the chart
