chart would be free for a numerical statement such as is found at the top of Fig. 68.
The scales of any curve chart should be so selected that the chart will not be exaggerated in either the horizontal or the vertical direction. It is possible to cause a visual exaggeration of data by carelessly or intentionally selecting a scale which unduly stretches the chart in either the horizontal or the vertical direction. Just as the English language can be used to exaggerate to the ear, so charts can exaggerate to the eye.
 | An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/93}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. |  |
Fig. 69. Average Income of 155 Princeton Graduates of the Class of 1901 for Ten Years After Graduation
Note the effect of the 1907 panic on incomes in 1908
A curve permits of finer interpretation than any other known method of presenting figures for analysis. Fig. 69 gives some information which many persons might not fully grasp if only a column of figures were used to indicate the average yearly earnings of Princeton graduates. The fairly uniform slope of the curve for the first six years after graduation indicates that the men were receiving almost uniform raises in pay each year. It must be remembered that a straight-line curve simply indicates that the amounts of the increases year by year are uniform in numerical value. If a curve were started at the lower left-hand corner of the chart and drawn diagonally across each of the rectangles of the chart, it would be seen at once that there would be a straight line indicating an increase in salary of $500 per year. With such a straight line across the chart, the increase in salary for the first year would be $500. As compared with a zero beginning-wage there would be an increase of an infinite percentage at the end of the first year. The next year the increase would again be $500. Compared to the $500 salary, the increase would be 100 per cent. The third year the increase would be $500, and compared to a $1,000 salary the increase would be only 50 per cent. A curve of uniform slope on any chart of rectangular co-ordinate lines indicates only that there has been a uniform increase or decrease in actual numbers, not
