between the lines of the circles, rather than the whole area included inside of each circle line.
Fig. 73 gives the data of Fig. 72 in curve form. The heavy solid line curve shows the changes from decade to decade as they could never be interpreted from either the actual figures or the circles of Fig. 72. The tremendous increase in the world's commerce between 1900 and 1910 is of very great interest, showing the effect which better means of communication have brought about as a result of the splendid increase in scientific and engineering knowledge.
 | An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/96}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. |  |
The Philadelphia Commercial Museum
Fig. 72. Annual Commerce of the World, Imports and Exports Combined. Shown at Ten-year Periods, 1850-1910
These circles, drawn on an area basis, are even more
difficult to interpret than the circles of Fig. 38.
The eye is likely to see the rings rather than the
whole areas of the circles. Compare Fig. 73
| An image should appear at this position in the text. To use the entire page scan as a placeholder, edit this page and replace "{{missing image}}" with "{{raw image|Graphic methods for presenting facts (1914).djvu/96}}". Otherwise, if you are able to provide the image then please do so. For guidance, see Wikisource:Image guidelines and Help:Adding images. | |
The Philadelphia Commercial Museum
Fig. 73. Annual Commerce of the World, Imports and Exports Combined. Shown at Ten-year Periods, 1850-1910
The solid line is plotted according to the figures
given in Fig. 72. The dotted line shows the
erroneous impression which would be obtained
by the reader if he should interpret Fig. 72 by
the diameters instead of by the areas of the
circles
If one makes comparisons between the circles of Fig. 72 on a diameter basis rather than on the area basis to which the circles were drawn, one gets an interpretation like that indicated by the dotted line in Fig. 73. By comparing the dotted line with the solid curve the reader may see the extent of the error which arises if circles are compared on a diameter basis after being drawn on an area basis.
Fig. 74 gives a good idea of the utility of the curve method for showing concisely a large quantity of data. If the figures for the price of cement had been expressed in dollars and shown in a long numerical column, there would be very few readers who would take the
