Page:Great Men and Famous Women Volume 7.djvu/159

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

THOMAS CHATTERTON 111 affection, few cases could have appealed more piteously for help. The wits who might have succored were out of town. Goldsmith lamented that he had not known him. Johnson, with his stern kindness, if such a thing had been possible, could have saved him from despair. His deportment in the family with whom he lived was without exception of decorum, although he showed that any move- ment toward familiarity with him was offensive. In his sore stress he began to write papers upon politics, which were accepted by the partisan press. It was at the time when the arbitrary encroachments of George III. were met by the audacious courage of Mayor Beckford. Chatterton attached himself to the pop- ular side ; yet he seemed to have regret for the mistake in so doing, because of the comparative want of money in that party. In a long letter written to his sister, most of which is occupied with his great undertakings, he spoke thus of his political works : " But the devil of the matter is, there is no money to be got on this side ot the question. Interest is on the other side. But he is a poor author who cannot write on both sides. I believe I may be introduced (and if not I'll introduce myself) to a ruling power in the court party. I might have a recommendation to Sir George Colebrook, an East India director, as qualified for an office by no means despicable ; but I shall not take a step to the sea whilst I can continue on land." In the midst of this struggle Beckford, the champion of popular rights, died suddenly, and the Walmsleys afterward testified that this event put Chatter- ton " perfectly out of his mind." Soon after this he removed to Brook Street, Holborn, and became a boarder in the house of one Angell, a sack-maker. Here he continued to work day and night until desperation, long threatened, seized upon him. Court journals grew tired of articles showing little talent for political discussion, and he became ragged and almost shoeless. In the only despondent letter ever sent to his mother, he wrote of having stumbled into an open grave one day while walking in St Pan- cras's Churchyard. The Angells, touched with his poverty and distress, kindly offered him food, which, except in one instance, he declined. One night after sitting with the family, apparently given over to despondency, he took affection- ate leave of his hostess and the next morning was found dead from a dose of arsenic. It was singular that the Rowlie writings were so far superioi to his produc- tions in modern English. The latter were commonplace, the former indicative of much genius. Indeed, one of the strongest evidences against their genuine- ness was the moral impossibility of their production in the age to which he as- signed them. The imitation was as pathetic as it was audacious, attempted thus in honor of a model that never had existed. /?^.^v2tLy<Ci