Page:History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce (Volume 2).djvu/470

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.


Evidence of Sir Richard Hotham before the Committee of Inquiry.


The effect of his evidence. Among the witnesses who appeared before the committee, there was no one more intelligent than Sir Richard Hotham, an eminent shipowner, who declared that the existing mode of freighting ships by the Company was absurd, and that their charter-party was one of the most useless for the purpose that could possibly be conceived. Analysing the whole system, and the clumsy and expensive mode in which they conducted their business, he gave the following particulars of what they actually paid for carriage on every ton of produce imported from the East:—

                                                £ s. d.
 80 tons of kentledge, at the fixed
      rate of 9l. 13s. 4d. per ton 773 6 4
 11 tons of China ware, at the chartered
      rate of 29l. per ton 319 0 0
393 tons of tea and silk, at the chartered
      rate of 32l. per ton 12,576 0 0
 15 tons, private trade, at the chartered
      rate of 32l. per ton 480 0 0
—- ——————-
499 14,148 6 4

Or equal to 32l. 10s. per ton, after the freight on kentledge had been deducted; and he showed how a saving could be effected in the cost of freightage on the vessels employed, from China alone, of upwards of 43,000l. annually.[1] Sir Richard offered to bring goods from any part of the East at twenty guineas per ton, and this offer, combined with other important facts which had been adduced*

  1. At a later period no less than 50l. per ton freight was on more than one occasion paid for the voyage, beyond an allowance for contingencies. From Hardy's 'Registry,' pp. 18, 20, and 22, at a court of Directors held on the 23rd September, 1796, the ship Admiral Gardner, of eight hundred and thirteen tons, commanded by "John