Its value, though unfair and one-sided. 1843, to all our consuls abroad, requesting information respecting the conduct and character of British shipmasters and seamen frequenting foreign ports; the replies to which produced a large mass of valuable information, presented to Parliament in 1848.[1] But this information would have been still more valuable had it been obtained in a less one-sided and invidious manner. "I am particularly desirous," remarks the writer of the circular, Mr. James Murray, "of gaining information in regard to instances which have come under your observation of the incompetency of British shipmasters to manage their vessels and their crews, whether arising from deficiency of knowledge of practical navigation and seamanship, or of moral character, particularly want of sobriety. . . . My object is to show the necessity for more authoritative steps on the part of Her Majesty's Government to remedy what appears to be an evil, detrimental to, and seriously affecting the character of, our commercial marine, and therefore advantageous to foreign rivals, whose merchant vessels are said to be exceedingly well manned and navigated."
Replies to circular.
Mr. Consul Booker.
With this assumption, that British ships and seamen
did exhibit the inferiority suggested by the
writer of the circular, it was but natural that the
answers to it should, as a rule, be in conformity with
the prejudged and premature opinions expressed in
it. Voluminous documents poured in from the different
consulates, and, certainly, some of them contained
charges of the gravest character against the
owners and crews of our merchant fleet. The first is
a letter (11th July, 1843) from Vice-Consul Booker,
- ↑ Papers relating to Commercial Marine of Great Britain.
