history, speak of the gorillas as among the most powerful and ferocious animals on earth. And this reputation is so firmly established in the popular mind that our plan of taking ladies with no previous hunting experience of any kind into a gorilla country in Central Africa was looked upon as madness. But to the general theory of the ferocity of wild animals I have never been a convert. And the more I have seen of wild animals in Africa the less I have believed in their ferocity. Consequently, I explained my creed concerning the gorillas in this fashion:
I believe that the gorilla is normally a perfectly amiable and
decent creature. I believe that if he attacks man it is because
he is being attacked or thinks that he is being attacked. I believe
that he will fight in self-defense and probably in defense
of his family; that he will keep away from a fight until he is
frightened or driven into it. I believe that, although the old
male advances when a hunter is approaching a family of gorillas,
he will not close in, if the man involved has the courage to stand
firm. In other words, his advance will turn out to be what is
usually called a bluff.
I believe, however, that the white man who will allow a gorilla to get within ten feet of him without shooting is a plain darn fool, for certainly the average man would have little show in the clutch of a three or four hundred pound gorilla.
My faith in the general amiability and decency of the gorilla is not based on experience or actual knowledge of any sort, but on deductions from the observation of wild animals in general and more particularly of monkeys. There are few animals that deliberately go into fight with an unknown antagonist or with a known antagonist, for that matter, without what seems to them a good reason. In other words, they are not looking for trouble.
The lion will fight when the maintenance of his dignity demands it. Most animals will fight only when driven to it through fear, either for themselves or their young.
