Page:Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Trial Judgment).pdf/13

III Post-Incident Conduct		[525]
IV Complaint Evidence or Prior Consistent Statements		[548]
V Subsequent Conduct Issues		[551]
H THE SECTION 25 DEFENCE		[561]
H.1 Introduction		[561]
H.2 Substantial Truth: Was there a Rape?		[562]
I What Needs to be Proven		[562]
II Non-Consent Element		[575]
III Knowledge Element		[588]
IV Further Observations as to Mr Lehrmann's "Critical" Submission		[603]
V The Role of Implied Admissions and Consciousness of Guilt		[613]
VI Conclusion on Rape		[620]
VII Differences between Imputations		[622]
I FINDINGS AS TO RELEVANT POST-INCIDENT CONDUCT		[630]
I.1 Introduction		[630]
I.2 The Immediate Aftermath: Miscellaneous Matters Referred to in Submissions		[632]
I.3 The Role of the AFP and the 2019 Decision of Ms Higgins not to Proceed		[656]
I.4 Why and When the PMO was told and Support Services		[708]
I.5 The Move to Western Australia		[719]
I.6 CCTV Footage		[733]
I.7 Later Events		[740]
I The Canberra Times Enquiry		[742]
II The Broadcast of the Four Corners Programmes		[754]
J FACTUAL FINDINGS OF RELEVANCE TO THE SECTION 30 DEFENCE		[760]
J.1 Introduction		[760]
J.2 The Genesis of the Story and the "Timeline" Document		[767]
J.3 The Investigation and Preparation		[782]

---