Page:Letters to a friend on votes for women.djvu/29

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR
19

are not represented in Parliament is no proof of their right to enfranchisement. To shout 'Votes for women!' does not prove that English women ought to have votes.

Let us next examine the specially English dogma[1] that 'taxation involves representation.' During the War of Independence it was the war-cry of American patriots, and was re-echoed by English Whigs, and notably by Chatham. It was a really serviceable formula at a crisis when it was of vital importance to remind ordinary Englishmen that the moral right, as well as the power, of the British Parliament to legislate for the inhabitants of Massachusetts or New York was materially affected by the fact that neither Massachusetts nor New York sent a single representative to the Parliament at Westminster. But neither the leaders in the War of Independence nor the Whigs of England

  1. 'The principle of "no taxation without representation" is the foundation of English liberty, and we feel that it is one on which we ought not to appeal to a Liberal Government in vain' ('Statement of Association of Registered Medical Women,' Times, December 14, 1908, p. 6).