were equal. To overcome, as much as possible, the friction of the fulcrum, the pin forming it was lubricated with sperm oil, and, during the descent, the head of the pin was struck lightly and rapidly with a small hammer.
After the bell crank was satisfactorily balanced, the link M was reattached, and the brake adjusted, by means of the screw which formed the connection between the link and the brake. It was adjusted so that a line upon the brake was perpendicular to the axis of the link, when the horizontal arm of the bell crank was horizontal. The length of the brake was then measured upon this line.
The length of the brake as thus measured was found to be . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
9.745 feet. | |
The effective length of the vertical arm of the bell crank was, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
4.500 feet.„ | |
And the effective length of the horizontal arm to which the scale was hung, was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
5.000 feet.„ | |
Consequently, the effective length of the brake was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
feet.„ | |
51. The gauges in the forebay, and in the wheelpit, were carefully adjusted by levelling from the top of the weir. This was repeated by different persons, so as to remove all chance of error.
52. The hook gauge was compared with the weir, by a different method. When the regulating gate of the turbine was shut down as tight as possible, it was still found that a quantity of water leaked into the wheelpit, exceeding, a little, the quantity that leaked out of the wheelpit, so that a small quantity continued to run over the weir. The principal leak into the wheelpit was between the regulating gate and the lower curb, the leather packing not being perfectly adjusted. The hook gauge was firmly attached to a post, placed in the wheelpit for that purpose, and at a height known to be nearly correct. The regulating gate was closed, and after the water had arrived at a uniform state, the height of the water at the hook gauge was noted, and, at the same time, the depths of the water on the weir were measured directly with a graduated rule. To perform this accurately, a board, about four inches long, was held by an assistant on the crest of the weir, at the place where it was intended to measure the depth; — the author then applied the rule, previously well dried, vertically, on the top of the weir, in front of the board. On first immersing the rule, the water in contact with it did not stand at the true level of the surface, but formed a little hollow around the rule; it immediately commenced rising, however, and after a few moments came to a level, which was indicated by the reflection of a light from the surface, a lamp being held by an assistant, in a proper position, for that purpose.
