evidence gathered in Dr. Abbott's 'St. Thomas of Canterbury,' and I think an unprejudiced reader will gather from that book conclusions somewhat different from those expected by the author.
After the Reformation what signs are there of psychic healing encouraged and sanctioned by the Church? We are compelled to answer that, in spite of great need, there is very little evidence of an intelligent effort at mental therapeutics. 'In spite of great need,' I say; for this country and Scotland were affected most terribly by the disgraceful witch mania which raged over Europe, especially in the Protestant countries. There was ample material for the quiet, consoling influence of psychic healing; but alas! the unfortunate 'witches' were left to the mercy of scared judges and malicious finders, to the horrors of the trial by floating, or the ordeal of the secret mark. The Church was, apparently, bigoted and powerless.
Yet the existence of an official power, inherent in the Body and acting normally through the Ministers of the Church, was recognised officially in the Canons of 1603-4, which, of course, are still of authority. In the 72nd Canon we read:
'No Minister or Ministers shall, without
