Page:Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie.djvu/44

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Sachs J

spouse also vests in the Master in certain circumstances, the law of evidence creates certain rules relating to evidence by spouses against or for one another,[1] and the law of delict recognises damages claims based on the duty of support.

[69]It should be added that formalisation of marriages provides for valuable public documentation. The parties are identified, the dates of celebration and dissolution are stipulated, and all the multifarious and socially important steps which the public administration is required to make in connection with children and forward planning, are facilitated. Furthermore, the commitment of the parties to fulfil their responsibilities is solemnly and publicly undertaken. This is particularly important in imposing clear legal duties on the party who is in the stronger position economically. Marriage stabilises relationships by protecting the vulnerable partner and introducing equity and security into the relationship.

[70]Marriage law thus goes well beyond its earlier purpose in the common law of legitimising sexual relations and securing succession of legitimate heirs to family property. And it is much more than a mere piece of paper.[2] As the SALRC Paper comments, the rights and obligations associated with marriage are vast. Besides other important purposes served by marriage, as an institution it was (at the time the SALRC Paper was produced) the only source of socio-economic benefits such as the


  1. Volks above n 75 at para 117.
  2. Id, see judgment of Skweyiya J at paras 53 and 59, and judgment of Ngcobo J at para 93.
44