Page:Myth, Ritual, and Religion (Volume 2).djvu/292

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
278
MYTH, RITUAL, AND RELIGION.

2proper names mythological names are the most difficult to interpret. Curtius has shown how many paths may be taken in the analysis of the name Achilles. The second part may be of the stem λαο = people, or the stem λας = stone. Does the first part of the word mean "water" (cf. aqua), or is it equivalent to Ἔχε as in Ἐχέλαος ("bulwark" or "the people")? Or is it akin to Ἄχι, as in ἄχος ("one who causes pain")? Or is the "prothetic"? and is χελ the root, and does it mean "clear-shining"? Or is the Word related to ἀχλύς, and does it mean "dark"?

All these and other explanations are offered by the learned, and are chosen by Curtius to show the uncertainty and difficulty of the etymological process as applied to names in myth. Cornutus remarked long ago that the great antiquity of the name of Athene made its etymology difficult. Difficult it remains.[1] Whatever the science of language may accomplish in the future, it is baffled for the present by the divine names of Greece, or by most of them, and these the most important.[2]

There is another reason for the obscurity of the topic besides the darkness in which the origin of the names has been Wrapped by time. The myths had been very long in circulation before we first meet them in Homer and Hesiod. We know not whence the gods came. Perhaps some of them were the chief

  1. Cf. Curtius, Greek Etym., Engl. transl., i. 137–139.
  2. Gruppe, Griech. Culte und Mythus, p. 169, selects Iapetos, Kadmos, Kabeiros, Adonis, Baitylos, Typhon, Nysos (in Dionysus), Acheron, Kimmerians, and Gryps, as certainly Phœnician. But these are not the names of the high gods.