lk)?,?r.] NATU?A[, ms?oR�. 513 ?UBIACE?.'?e e?s?e OF several pl? o? ?ive F?il? ? ?e ?opi? p? o? Te?& es?l? wh? ?d? b? some hdi?idu?s exo?c ?i?s, that ;orm �prominent ;e?ure other ?uin?fi? ?i?, ?d, in ?me me?ure, ?nish ? ?uliaF ?teF O? ?e ye?e?on of Te?& Aus?is on thee shores, ?d ? it is & co?d?1o ?simila?u ? the Flora of a ?t of a ?n?t ? h? ? ?ed. About ?irty s?ies ?e se.ed ? ?e co11?om of ? voy?s, for ?e most ?1ou?ug ? genera exis? in India, but more ab?d?t the tropic? ?m of ?u? America. Of ?ese, ?rdenia, Gue?da, ?phaells, ?$ea, Ps?o- ?ia, ?d Mofinda, ?e found ?u ?e E?t corms?uding p?leis on the op?si?, or north-wes?ra shores, ?e order, ?ough not magially. redu?d, is mi?d ? the two later genera, wi? ?ndeleti? lxo? Genie. It ? wo?hy of r?atk, that ?e ? of Psycho?a, w?ch h? not ?en obseoed beyond ?e ?opics in o? count?, ex?nds in New South Wales ? far sou? ? ?e !afi?de of 3?; at ?e western ex?emity of which it doe? not ap? to exls? U?mro?t?, ?s.--?e situation of ?nthus and Vis- rum, in ?e system, appears to be undete?ined by thors. M. Juss[eu associated them with Rhimpho?, the second section of this order, from which Mr. Brown has separated thi? latter genus, and with two o?ers foun? in Terra Australis, has constructed a distinct family, named Rhizophor?m; sug?sfing, at the same time, the ?alo?y of ?anthus and Viscum to ?ant?em, ?d p?ticul?ly Vo?. I[. 2 L
�
