Page:Nestorius and his place in the history of Christian doctrine.djvu/37

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
RECENTLY AWAKENED
25

light; for now between the beginning quoted by Philoxenus and the fragment of the British Museum a section is missing, the length of which we do not know. Nevertheless the genuineness of the letter seems to me now to be more probable than the contrary[1].

The beginning of the letter refers to the synod of Constantinople, held in 448 by Flavian for the purpose of condemning Eutyches, and the criticism of his doctrine given by Leo in his letter to Flavian. It is my doctrine, so Nestorius declares, which Leo and Flavian are upholding[2]. Then, after the omissions, some assertions corresponding to the doctrine of Nestorius only as described by Cyril, are disproved. Then follow polemics against Cyril, rejecting various quotations from the Fathers which he was in the habit of using in supporting his doctrine, these quotations being for the most part apollinaristic forgeries[3]. Then the letter ends in exhortations. These conclude with the words preserved also by Philoxenus: Believe as our holy comrades in the faith, Leo and Flavian! Pray that a general council be gathered in order that my doctrine, i.e. the doctrine of all orthodox Christians, be confirmed. My hope is, that when the first has taken place, the second, too, will come to pass[4]. Here Nestorius is wooing the interest of his readers for the council of

  1. Comp. note 3.
  2. Nau, p. 374; i, 3.
  3. This fact evidently is in favour of the genuineness of the letter.
  4. Nau, p. 375; iii, 19.