Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/256

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Jackson and Nullification
9

"the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one state, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorised by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which it was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed."[1] The object of the Nullifiers, he set forth, was disunion; "but," he added, "be not deceived by names; disunion, by armed force, is treason....The laws of the United States must be executed."

The President's message, which had appeared in print a few days before the proclamation, received no little praise from the pens of the State Rights editors because of its sound doctrines on the tariff.[2] At that time the intentions of those in power were not fully known; but the proclamation left no doubt. It was hailed as a declaration of war by the President against South Carolina.[3] When contrasted with the message of a few days before, it seemed to show that "this unhappy old man" had been induced by his advisers to arrogate the power to coerce a state of the

  1. Richardson, Messages and Papers of the Presidents, II, 643.
  2. Mercury, December 10, 1832; Messenger, December 19.
  3. Mercury, December 17, 1832; Messenger, December 26.