Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/299

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
280
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

of more than one man in fifty for the purchase of arms. Such as they had, the people would use and use well, but they were too poor to buy. Whenever they were called into regular service, the state must expect to arm them, if they were to act efficiently. They might skirmish in the woods and harass invaders with their shotguns, but they could not stand a moment in the field before a regular force properly equipped.[1]

It was even rumored among the Unionists that the British consul in Charleston, who was said to be a Nullifier, had assured his friends that he had written to the commander of the British squadron in the West Indies requesting him to send some war vessels to Charleston harbor to protect the persons and property of English subjects. Whatever the pretext, said the Unionists, the appearance of such a force would encourage the Nullifiers, for their leaders had led them to believe that in a contest with the federal government they would receive the aid of Great Britain.[2]

Meanwhile the Union party was not inactive, for many believed that, if the tariff bill failed to

  1. Hammond Papers: Hayne to Hammond, February 12, 1833; Hammond to Hayne, February 24.
  2. Jackson Papers: Poinsett to Jackson, February 9, 1833.