Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/77

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
58
Nullification Controversy in South Carolina

a law of the general government void and inoperative in that state on account of its unconstitutionality. In other words, they held that authority to pass it was not delegated by the states in the formation of the Union, and, that the state, not having agreed when it entered the confederacy to the exercise of such authority by Congress, would not allow it to be exercised now unless three-fourths of the states, according to the terms of the Constitution, agreed to make this sanction an addition to that Constitution. In that event the state must submit, or rebel against its own stipulations and revolutionize the government.[1] In the case of the tariff the consent of the three-fourths of the states, necessary to give the power to continue to pass tariffs, would not be secured;[2] the southern cause would be triumphant and the republic saved. Surely there was nothing dreadful about that.[3]

  1. Columbia Southern Times, May 10, 1830.
  2. The tariff men could muster eighteen states, but that would not be three-fourths.
  3. To make this process more simple, some suggested that the southern states should endeavor to procure such an amendment to the federal Constitution as would give one-fourth of the states, through their representatives in Congress, the power to demand that an act of the federal legislature, threatening an infringement of their rights or affecting their interests, should be passed by a majority