Page:Organised Crime Act 2015.pdf/38

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
ORGANISED CRIME
39


(5) The specified person may also disclose any answer, information, or report for the purposes of the prevention, detection, investigation or prosecution of offences in Singapore.

(6) A disclosure under this section does not breach—

(a) any obligation of confidence owed by the person making the disclosure; or
(b) any other restriction however imposed (other than a restriction imposed under any written law) on the disclosure of information.

(7) In this section, references to a report include any of its contents, any document included with the report, or any of the contents of such a document.

Division 2—Failure to comply with OCPO or FRO

Failure to comply with OCPO or FRO

26.—(1) A person must not, without reasonable excuse, fail to comply with an OCPO or FRO.

(2) Despite anything in the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap. 68), a person is not excused from complying with an OCPO or FRO on the ground that the supply of any information might tend to incriminate the person or make the person liable to a penalty.

(3) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction—

(a) in the case of an individual, to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both; or
(b) in any other case, to a fine not exceeding $20,000.

(4) In proceedings for an offence under this section, a copy of the original OCPO or FRO or any variation of it, certified as such by the proper officer of the court which made it, is admissible as evidence of its having been made and of its contents to the same extent that oral evidence of those things is admissible in those proceedings.