but when the zenith distance is greater than 80°, the author con- siders the accuracy of the French table questionable, both on account of the hypothetical law of the densities, and because the quantity assumed for the horizontal refraction is uncertain.
After giving a few examples, illustrative of the use of the new table, the author inquires how far the refractions are likely to be affected by the term which it was found necessary to leave out, be- cause the present state of our knowledge of the phenomena of the atmosphere made it impossible to determine the coefficient by which it is multiplied. For this purpose, the variable part of that term has been comi^uted for every half degree, from 85° to 88°, and the results are exhibited in a table. From this it appears, that this co- efficient, although considerably less than that of the preceding term, may still have some influence on the refractions at very low alti- tudes. The mean refraction in Bessel's table, and in the new table, can hardly be supposed to differ 2" from the true quantity, which would limit the coefficient in question to be less than one- tenth. It is a matter of some importance to obtain a near value of this coeffi- cient ; and it is probable that this can be accomplished in no other way, than by searching out such values of the two coefficients as will best represent many good observed refractions at altitudes less than 5°. If such values were found, our knowledge of the decrease of heat in ascending in the atmosphere would be improved, and the measurement of heights by the barometer would be made more per- fect.
At the end of the paper is given a table of mean refractions for the temperature 50° Fahr. and barometric pressure 30 inches, at every degree from 0° to 70° zenith distance, and at every 10' from 70° to the horizon ; and tables of the corrections requisite for va- riations of the thermometer and barometer are subjoined.
May 31, 1838.
DAVIES GILBERT, Esq., V.P., in the Chair.
The Rev. John Hymers was duly elected a Fellow of the Society.
A paper was read, entitled, " Remarks on the Theory of the Dispersion of Light, as connected with Polarization." By the Rev. Baden Powell, M.A., F.R.S., Savilian Professor of Geometry in the University of Oxford.
The present paper is a sequel to those already presented by the author to the Royal Society, in which he had instituted a comparison of the observations of the refractive indices for the standard rays of light in various media, with the results calculated from theoretical formulse, deduced from the most improved views of the undulatory hypothesis ; the cases discussed including the greatest range of data as yet furnished by experiment. The comparison exhibited an accordance sufficient to warrant the conclusion that the theory af-
