Page:Satire in the Victorian novel (IA satireinvictoria00russrich).pdf/48

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

"The only source of the true Ridiculous (as it appears to me) is affectation. * * * Now affectation proceeds from one of these two causes, vanity or hypocrisy; for as vanity puts us on affecting false characters, in order to purchase applause; so hypocrisy sets us on an endeavour to avoid censure, by concealing our vices under an appearance of their opposite virtues. * * *

"From the discovery of this affectation arises the Ridiculous;

  • * * I might observe, that our Ben Jonson, who of all

men understood the Ridiculous the best, hath chiefly used the hypocritical affectation."


He remarks that this is more amusing than vanity, from the sharper contrast with reality, and adds:


"Now, from affectation only, the misfortunes and calamities of life, or the imperfections of nature, may become the objects of ridicule. * * *

"The poet carries this very far:

'None are for being what they are in fault,
But for not being what they would be thought.'"


He concludes:


"Great vices are the proper objects of our detestation, smaller faults of our pity; but affectation appears to me the only true source of the Ridiculous."


Fielding's comment on Jonson is in turn applied to him by a modern critic:[1]


"All Fielding's evil characters, it may be remarked, are accomplished hypocrites; on pure vanity or silliness he spends very few of his shafts."


  • [Footnote: name of satire is formidable to those persons, who would appear to the world

what they are not in themselves:"]

  1. Raleigh: The English Novel.