commanders, are mainly occupied with fire control and fire direction, and should influence the men by their personal example, superior commanders have other tasks, which they must not neglect for the purpose of interfering in the sphere of action of their subordinates. They can influence the fire action only by sending the necessary forces to those portions of the firing line whose fire they wish to augment. An interference on their part with the action of subordinates is permissible only in case of obvious misunderstandings or mistakes, which would cause the combat to take a course other than that intended. The larger the unit commanded by an officer, the greater the latitude that must be allowed him. The leaders should concentrate their attention upon the general execution of their special tasks as part of the whole scheme, rather than upon supervision of details. It is by no means essential for all parts of the force to employ identical means to attain one and the same object. Every leader should bear in mind that omission or neglect are greater crimes than a mistake made in the choice of means.
The initiative of leaders of all grades is the foundation of great victories in war, but this initiative must neither jeopardize unity of action nor direct the course of events into channels not intended by the commander.[1]
The best safeguard against the results of an act of unjustifiable initiative is to ask oneself: "What orders would my superior have to give me, if he were in my place and knew what I know?"
14. UNITED ACTION VERSUS TACTICAL MISSIONS.
Although no one disputes that victory depends upon a superiority of
fire at the decisive point, yet there is a great diversity of opinion as to
how this superiority is to be attained.
General Bronsart von Schellendorff states:[2] "Every battle seeks to bring about a decisive victory, but this is, after all, invariably the sum
