x Teme-Filit.. xxv 4. Be? I have a ?tt? opin?n of the t?, t? to belie. re that t?g would k? company with?ch caule. and I think it a f?ndal to the uni. ,e? to ?and in n? of a ?tute, w?ich fuppo?$ that any of h? hopeM1 ehflflren me add?&ed to fuch' W?cr I am in the r?ht h mr explication of this flatute, or not, I am fare t?t I have on my fide the authority and ?ncu?ence oF on? ?t? men, the ?f? men, the mo? Icarn? men, and the mo? pious men, thmgh one of the moa fortmate ram, that this, or p?haps any other country' ? fiw ? no Ie? than a King and a to whom a a Ma?r ? the loyal ?iverfity of O?ord adh? fo iramove. ably, whiI? li?in ? whole memory, now he is dead, (he fo affe&ionat?.y reveres? and: who/? injun&?ions and admonitions, above tho�e of all other m?m, {he holds fo dear, that I am perfuaded no advice of his will I? defpifed thrre, none of his precepts reR What was his opinion in the prefent ca? ma?/ be feen in a letter of his to the uni?erfity of CaM- BRm?�, entituled? King CHa?Es the Firfi, his lnflxu?ons to the Vice- Chancellor ?nd Heads ef Cambridge, J?r govern- met. t, &c. ?hic? are m CH?RLES Rex s I. ,, ?hat all tho? dire&ions and orders .of' our fither, bteff? of memory, which?at my time were fen.t to our .fiid tmivedity, be du}I obferv'd and put m execution. I1." Whereas we have been infor/m'd that, oF late years, many itudents of that otlr tmivertity not- regarding their own birth, degree, and have made divers contra&s of marriage with men of r/?,'?.?e, and of no good f?me? {n that town, to thetr great difpara?ment, ?e difcontent
�
