The rea&r may fee this letter in a book, intitul? Carnal. a, or The b_?fterie$ of State, (what page I cannot fir, lx?ufe I have not the book by me) or Cambridge. 'In this wi/? manner did that ble,?d Mar9,r, and t encourager o lu?rnln, inflrugt his univer& Cam?idgt: whether he f?t the time mflvu?i?m to Oxf?g I onnot find, though it is wy likely he did b?t' if he did not, we ?n impute it to nothing but th?s, ?hat the time complaintsa?infi Ox?rd had not tach d his reyal ears; for, as his maje?y. had the time ?f? for ?ath his unionrifles, fo there ?on to doubt? tht he would have r?ch'd out the time/at& 0 ?dvi?e to tkm both, hd they both fi? in need of it. H?ppy is it for the. preknt ?afion of Ox?r2 Toasvs, the ?'?g Cu?uzs I. (fo much unlike t?t acco&plifl?d Ge?tlem?, his fon,) was l?g ?,v?hid in the duff! Were that rigid Kin now my mind midiyes me ?r?gely,?hat I ?d loon ?e an end of?il the b?11? and ket?g$ at Oxford; that fevnal of nut moff cde- ?t? md right Nautifd madams wo?d pluck th6r fine f?h?s, and bet?[e themfel?es mfl livdihood; or make thdr ?rfonal ap?uce b?- fore the ? ? bb m4e?y's pfivy-councit? to f?er their ?ontem?t, a? fuch matters a?3oald But Hz is d?d ? and the 8e?ll?, as much a? they tflk ?r him, at vine c?ta?fl?)m, have .fi enough for h?m, or have too much re? for the ?die?, to take his advice in this ?ic?r. I do not ch?ge a? the Ox?rd To?s?s ?th the ?e ill f?e, or the ?me ?1 d?g? ? nor ?ould ? ?efieond :?tico, p. 38.
�
