A P P'E-N'D I X. the complaints againl! the univer. tlty of Ox.?rd, has not been taken notice of for above there )?urj%re tYhears ?a ? This will, I fear, ? the confequence at f?eming p?rti?i}y which runs through yourbook, by complaim'ng fo ?arply of one point ofly which ageas yosr fl? and l=ving even unm?non'd all thole other grievances, corruph?n?, and defeas, which have bcea fo frequmtly ?mplfined of, and ?e? equally to require R?r?ion and Redre?. However, Sir, fince the angui? of your ?ounds, was fo very ?arp, as to make you entirely negle& the complaints of your fellow-luSters, we are notwithRandin obliged to you ev? for this in? voluntary ?rvxce, this undefign d te?mony to all the world, horn fo eminent an hnd, that the uni- verity of Ox?rd i? not fo fre from Blem?et, au rome perforts would fu e?; but, in one inCarice gg . . Iea?, dands in need of corre&?on: u?n which earlon I ?ke the liberty to return you my thanks, however you may pl?fe to accept of them, for borating my evidmce, info publick a manner, and eperating with me in this glorious uMertaking. Havin? thus paid my compliments in due and reco?niz'd y'ou for my fellow.labot?rer in the ?auk of [hat fi?ous gaive?ty, of which we have Mth had the honour to be membes? ?ve me l=v? io review your h'e book, with that ?eedom ? partiali? which be?me our common chinder R(ormers: in which enquiry asI ?all with ?=tpIe=- lure acknowledge where I agree withyou, fo I ?aH, without fmr of your refentme?t, as frmkly &dare how far i am obliged to differ m my fentiments. Your thoughts upon this fubje? were occafion'd by the fiatute, * ?hieh Fohi3its the admiffon fohohrs going from on? eo?ege or ha? to. ?otber, ?ith,
�
